Methodology

The science behind every zone

DumpRadar is built on 40+ peer-reviewed studies and 17 free federal datasets. Here is exactly how the zones, the score, and the data fit together.

The zone framework

Three impact zones, grounded in epidemiology

Research establishes distinct exposure bands radiating from a landfill. These are the scientific basis for DumpRadar's zones.

Red Zone0–1 mile

Highest risk. Acute respiratory symptoms correlated with H₂S, groundwater leachate (heavy metals, benzene), and landfill gas migrating into basements. Residents within 1 mile show 38% greater odds of lower life satisfaction (NIH 2024).

Key pollutants: H₂S, methane, benzene, vinyl chloride, dioxins, PCBs, PAHs, lead, mercury, arsenic, ammonia, PFAS.

Orange Zone1–3 miles

Moderate risk. Air dispersion and groundwater plume migration are active. The EUROHAZCON study (Lancet) designated 0–3 km the "proximate" zone for elevated congenital anomalies near hazardous sites.

Key pollutants: dispersed VOCs, particulate matter, episodic H₂S, bioaerosols.

Yellow Zone3–5 miles

Low-to-moderate risk. An Oxford study of 242,409 people within 5 km of nine landfills found a strong association between H₂S exposure and lung-cancer mortality and respiratory hospitalization.

Key pollutants: cumulative VOC exposure, regional particulates, legacy groundwater migration.

Green Zone5 miles+

Minimal documented risk from a single landfill. Controls placed 8–40 km away showed no statistically significant elevation. This does not mean "safe" in absolute terms — only that risk isn't distinguishable from background rates.

Zone radii expand or compress with the EIS score

Normalized EISClassificationRedOrangeYellow
85–100Extreme2.0 mi5.0 mi7.5 mi
70–84Severe1.5 mi4.0 mi6.0 mi
55–69Elevated1.0 mi3.0 mi5.0 mi
40–54Moderate0.75 mi2.0 mi4.0 mi
20–39Low0.5 mi1.5 mi3.0 mi
0–19Minimal0.25 mi1.0 mi2.0 mi

Zones are then made asymmetric by prevailing wind: downwind sectors extend ~50% farther; upwind sectors compress ~40%.

The score

Environmental Impact Score (EIS) v2.0

16 factors across 4 domains, on a 200-point raw scale normalized to 0–100. Higher scores expand the zones.

A50 pts

Facility Characteristics

Type & waste stream, age & liner era, capacity utilization, flood-zone status.

B50 pts

Emissions & Gas Control

Reported methane (GHGRP), gas-collection effectiveness, subsurface fire, PFAS emission risk.

C60 pts

Contamination Pathways

Liner & leachate controls, enforcement history, TRI toxic inputs, proximity to water.

D40 pts

Community Vulnerability

Red-zone population, sensitive groups, environmental justice, wind-direction exposure.

Want to see it applied? Every facility report shows all 16 factors with the exact points awarded and why. Open the map →
The data

17 free federal data sources

Every source is free and publicly accessible via government API or download. Total licensing cost: $0.

Wired into the live weekly pipeline today: EPA GHGRP (reported methane), FEMA NFHL (flood zone), EPA ECHO (enforcement — also refreshed live in your browser when you open a report), and Census ACS (community demographics, where a key is configured). The remaining sources below are on the integration roadmap; to stay honest, any factor we haven't measured yet contributes 0 to a facility's score and is disclosed on its report.
#SourceWhat it providesFormatAuthUpdate
The PFAS layer

The data layer existing tools missed

A 2025 USC/NIH study linked PFAS in drinking water to an estimated 4,626–6,864 cancer cases per year. Washington State explicitly uses "within 1 mile of a landfill" as a PFAS screening criterion. The EPA's UCMR5 dataset — 1.7M+ results across 9,950+ public water systems — is freely available and used by no consumer tool today.

DumpRadar pulls UCMR5 results for every public water system within a facility's zones and compares them directly to the 4 ng/L EPA limit for PFOA and PFOS.

4 ng/L

EPA limit for PFOA & PFOS (finalized Apr 2024)

9,950+

Public water systems in UCMR5

Evidence

Key scientific citations

FindingSourceYear

DumpRadar is an informational tool and is not a substitute for a professional environmental site assessment. Risk classifications are modeled estimates derived from public data.